[BRLTTY] Low-level BrlAPI questions
Aura Kelloniemi
kaura.dev at sange.fi
Thu Apr 15 12:23:59 EDT 2021
On 2021-04-15 at 17:59 +0200, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> Sébastien Hinderer, le jeu. 15 avril 2021 17:54:33 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Perhaps we should rename it to brlapi_writeTextUTF16 then, withthe due
> > deprecation logic? It'd feel more meaningful to me than a name talking
> > aobut the OS. What do you think, Samuel?
> "UTF16" will not ring any bell to windows programmers.
> And UTF16 is not used by non-windows programmers.
Side note: Widow$ does not actually use UTF-16. Window$' characters are
arbitrary 16-bit integers which may or may not denote a valid UTF-16 sequence.
--
Aura
More information about the BRLTTY
mailing list