[BRLTTY] Need help remapping display

[S. Massy]

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 07:56:11PM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by S. Massy on 2011/10/25 at 19:14 -0400]
> 
> >Excellent! It now works, thanks.
> 
> Well ... there's nothing like checking the code. :-)
> 
> >While I'm on the line: Is there a specific way in which commands are
> >mapped when two definitions concur? E.G, if I keep
> >"RoutingKey+!RoutingKey COPYCHARS" as a statement, would both FWINRT and
> >COPYCHARS be executed? Is there some kind of precedence of execution
> >going on here I should be aware of?
> 
> Yes, and no. If you bind a given key combination to two commands, it's 
> undefined as to which one you'll get. Preference is given, however, to that 
> which is more specific. Your explicit bindings, therefore, will take 
> precendence to the general binding for COPYCHARS, so COPYCHARS will work for 
> any two routing keys which you haven't yet made an explicit binding for. That's 
> the way it's supposed to work, anyway. If it doesn't, please do let us know.
That's indeed how it works, and is a very sound scheme. Perhaps to be
noted, however, is that a narrow definition will still be superseded by
a broader one if the later is set for immediate exec ution by the !
prefix.

Cheers,
S.M.