[BRLTTY] [SPAM] Re: A strange Unicode translation

[Dave Mielke]

[quoted lines by Nicolas Pitre on 2012/07/03 at 11:40 -0400]

>I had a nagging suspicion that this could be another 32-bit vs 64-bit 
>issue, but I'm unable to reproduce this on a 64-bit host either.  

Thanks for testing.

>What I get is:
>
>prot`eg`e

Yes, that's what's expected. The contraction table translates "protégé" to 
"prot`eg`e". Then the text table is simply used to decide which character to 
use for each dot pattern. Since fputc() is used, only one character should be 
written.

-- 
Dave Mielke           | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible is the very Word of God.
Phone: 1-613-726-0014 | Ottawa, Ontario   | 2011 May 21 is the End of Salvation.
EMail: dave at mielke.cc | Canada  K2A 1H7   | http://Mielke.cc/now.html
http://FamilyRadio.com/                   | http://Mielke.cc/bible/