[BRLTTY] Prompt matching.

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Fri, 12 Oct 2018, Dave Mielke wrote:

> I haven't heard any feedback on the current implementation of this feature yet,
> but I do have a question about it:
> 
> Right now, if at least one prompt pattern is defined then the original scheme
> isn't used. I'm thinking that it might be more useful if the original scheme
> were implicitly still used (as a fallback) in the case that none of the
> patterns match.

I don't think that would be a good idea.  If you did explicitly define a 
prompt match, that's most likely because the default one doesn't match 
what you want, or worse it matches what you don't want. So the best 
thing to do in that context is simply to alert the user that no matching 
prompts are available.


Nicolas