[BRLTTY] Should I consider putting an SVN snapshot of BrlTTY into Ubuntu?

[Luke Yelavich]

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:31:59PM EST, Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by Luke Yelavich on 2009/02/12 at 14:23 +1100]
> 
> >I would actually rather get it in by the end of this week, so perhaps grabbing 
> >latest svn would be best, however if you are able to get a tarball ready by 
> >say Tuesday, I may be able to get that in by the 19th.
> 
> I'll try. Just for you, though, I'll consider 4.0 content to be frozen as of 
> now, other than documentation updates and last minute problems reported by 
> anyone. So, everyone who's reading this, please give the latest revision a 
> thorough test as soon as possible so that we can ensure that 4.0 is a quality 
> release.

Ok thanks, but I will just use svn, so no rush with the tarball.

> >At this point, I will go with whats in svn. Do you have any tight requirements 
> >on what autoconf/automake versions are needed to build the configure/makefile 
> >pieces?
> 
> We don't use automake. autoconf-2.53 is the earliest one we guarantee. If you 
> run into any problems then let me know and I'll try to accommodate them.

Great, that suits me fine.

Thanks again

Luke
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mielke.cc/pipermail/brltty/attachments/20090212/ca4cb430/attachment.bin