[BRLTTY] Broken colour names

[Samuel Thibault]

Shérab, on Tue 17 Nov 2015 15:26:25 +0100, wrote:
> I was just wondering whether it wouldn't e
> possible to improve r enrich AT-SPI to make it more suitable for
> terminals, my concern being to avoid having too many standards and APIs
> around. But if you think it's best to just have another API besides, I
> am fine.

It's also a question of dependencies. bterms will probably be fine
with implementing a shared-memory segment if it's simple enough. They
will much less like to either implement the whole complexity of at-spi
requests, or depend on a library that implements it (atk, and thus
glib).

Samuel