[BRLTTY] The Baum driver should *NOT* claim a TSI display!

Jason White jasonw at ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au
Mon Aug 27 05:14:10 EDT 2007


On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:31:43AM +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
> > I like this approach. If we're all in agreement then I'll make the change,
> > which would be that the Baum driver would continue to check for emulation modes
> > if USB is bieng used but would only check for the native Baum protocol if
> > serial or Bluetooth is being used.
> 
> The Bluetooth part in the above sentence looks like an error.

Unless Bluetooth looks to the host like a serial interface?
> Besides, I am not a Baum Vario user, but if I were and would use my
> serial interface, I'd not like to loose the ability to use
> compatibility modes.  What about coupling the above approach with
> a boolean braille driver parameter that would still allow a user
> to enable probing of compatibility modes even if a serial interface is used?

That would be the ideal solution.


More information about the BRLTTY mailing list