[BRLTTY] Are changes needed for systemd 247.1?

Dave Mielke Dave at mielke.cc
Mon Dec 7 15:33:12 EST 2020


[quoted lines by Alexander Epaneshnikov on 2020/12/07 at 21:47 +0300]

>this doesn't made any difference. 

Maybe this one shouldn't hold up 6.2, then. In the end, it's a time bomb just
waiting to strike. :-( We really need the systemd people to help us figure this
one out.

How hard would it be to figure out exactly which systemd broke it?

>i am thinking should we try to add implecete dependency on device-unit to
>brltty at .service. 

The problem is that we can't add stuff to the device unit as it's virtual.

>i tried: BindsTo=%I After=%I

I think we need one that works the other way around. Maybe try PatOf.
nevertheless, there's still a problem. The controlling unit could be a path or
a device unit, and we don't know which one it is.

-- 
I believe the Bible to be the very Word of God: http://Mielke.cc/bible/
Dave Mielke            | 2213 Fox Crescent | WebHome: http://Mielke.cc/
EMail: Dave at Mielke.cc  | Ottawa, Ontario   | Twitter: @Dave_Mielke
Phone: +1 613 726 0014 | Canada  K2A 1H7   |


More information about the BRLTTY mailing list