[BRLTTY] Are changes needed for systemd 247.1?

[Alexander Epaneshnikov]

09.12.2020 00:21, Dave Mielke пишет:
> [quoted lines by Alexander Epaneshnikov on 2020/12/08 at 23:35 +0300]
>
>> cano't believe! two days and finally. we don't need device unit.
>> i modified rule:
> ...
>> ENV{SYSTEMD_WANTS}+="brltty at .service"
> Then we'd have no way to fix the relative path problem, so I think keeping the
> device part is good. It also means that we can now treat devices different from
> paths. So I'm okay with keeping it.
Yes. maybe it's really better.
>> now I'm a little angry with myself. walking around for two days and not
>> understanding simple things.
> Not at all! Sure, things are simple when we fnially learn how they work, but
> we've both learned a lot from all of this that we didn't already know. I think
> it's been a good experience and that you shouldn't be so hard on yourself. I
> also think we have a nicer set of rules/units now, and that wouldn't have
> happened.
>
thanks for the nice words. after reading this I really agree.

when you push the final changes, I'm ready to double-check everything. now i
am using 6.1.r665.g08154296e-1

-- 
Sincerely, Alexander.