[BRLTTY] Should I consider putting an SVN snapshot of BrlTTY into Ubuntu?

[Luke Yelavich]

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:14:34PM EST, Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by Luke Yelavich on 2009/02/12 at 12:34 +1100]
> 
> >Since there is lots thats changed, I would like to get something in before 
> >next Thursday at the latest, so at this point I think I'll grab latest svn, if 
> >its stable enough for regular use. Objections?
> 
> No objections, and it should be safe for public use. It's taken me a while to 
> resolve a problem that one user was having, but that's been done now.
> 
> Do you mean Thursday the 19th? I think I'm actually prepared to release 4.0 
> with what we have now so the latest revision will essentially be the same as 
> what 4.0 will be. I can try to go through all the formal motions of releasing 
> 4.0 by the 19th if yu'd prefer, but if grabbing the latest revision is just the 
> same for you then I'll feel freer to take my time.

I would actually rather get it in by the end of this week, so perhaps grabbing latest svn would be best, however if you are able to get a tarball ready by say Tuesday, I may be able to get that in by the 19th.

At this point, I will go with whats in svn. Do you have any tight requirements on what autoconf/automake versions are needed to build the configure/makefile pieces?

Thanks again

Luke
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mielke.cc/pipermail/brltty/attachments/20090212/d00bd41a/attachment.bin