[BRLTTY] PLEASE ......................... explain ?

Thu Dec 16 11:11:59 EST 2010

Dear Dave,

I will not answer to your provocations & wrongly interpretation of the 
situation;
just let me say a few things:

first of all, I sended you privately a mail with the address I asked to
subscribe, on december the 2nd, the 6th and the 12th (checked);

No Any (I insist no one of these mails) was aggressive or
unpolish

so feel free to accuse me from all the things you want to satisfy your
need of aggression, I haven't said nor thought the things you're accusing me.  

I regret that such a problem still isn't resolved, and I apollogy for the
excessive noise I had Never Never desired myself.

It's uncorrect the way you handled me but I can't help if you decide to
do so against me.

Merry Christmas anyway!
I will see how does I can resolve the problem.

Labrador

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 01:08:12PM -0500, Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by Labrador on 2010/12/12 at 15:49 +0100]
> 
> >Well then:
> >
> >- why aren't you helping me ? 
> 
> Probably because I had no time when you asked, and then forgot about the issue.
> 
> At this point, hwoever, my answer is changing. I resist those who think that 
> they can command how I spend my time. Even my manager at my paying job doesn't 
> speak to me the way you are.
> 
> >it's not my fault that your Mailman machine doesn't respond to classical 
> >subscription requests ? 
> 
> And it's not my fault either.
> 
> As I proposed in my last message, why don't you figure out which setting needs 
> to be tweaked and then let me know what it is? You'd probably end up spending 
> less time doing that then you have yelling at me.
> 
> >or are we banned because it doesn't work until now ?
> 
> No one has been banned.
> 
> >- why aren't you responding to mail directly sended to you with specific ask
> >for subscribing a certain address ?
> 
> I no longer remember when you sent me a private message. If I didn't respond to 
> it, though, there were likely two reasons. The first is that, at least so far, 
> I have no idea what might be causing your problem. The second is that it'd 
> likely take me a lot of time to figure it out and I didn't have the time then 
> to invest in it.
> 
> >>It's all too 
> >> easy for any of us to think that our own problems are more important than 
> >>those 
> >> of others, 
> >
> >You said this! I don't thought so!
> 
> Then why are you insisting so vehemently that I have to drop everything just to 
> solve your problem?
> 
> >I've no any problem with no any list changes operated currently with lots of
> >other mlists;
> >so I would aks you please please please to be a little bit more colaborative
> >and help me since it doesn't work as expected:
> 
> I guess it's because I'm a very rude person.
> 
> >I send you the mail to subscribe privately, and that's the only thing we
> >probably can do,
> 
> You've been very rude toward me lately so I'm becoming more and more 
> disinterested in this problem. It's now lower on my priority list than it used 
> to be.
> 
> >it's now ten days ago and the problem is still the same:
> >are you happy with this ?
> 
> Yes, because I don't think it's right to feed someone's rudenss by giving in to 
> it. Why should the loudest person always get the best service?
> 
> >that's why I asked for helping!
> >but if it will take ten days more I will consider this as a refusal to help!
> 
> If that's the way you're going to speak to me then, as of right now, I refuse 
> to help with this problem. You don't need to wait 10 more days to make that 
> decision.
> 
> >but isn't it possible to ask to a second person to co-administrate the list
> >so that there should be a kind of "permanence" ? I use do so since I was in
> >the hospital in 2009 and so unavailable!
> 
> no, there's no need since your rudeness has removed your problem from the 
> table.
> 
> Maybe you think I'm now truly being rude. The fact is that you've been going 
> out of your way to point out just how rude and unhelpful you think I've been 
> for a few days now, and I wouldn't want to turn all your claims into lies by 
> becoming helpful.
> 
> >> I'm too lazy to go looking for it. Why not just retype it 
> >>here so 
> >> that it's right in front of me. That'd be less typing than the instructions 
> >>of 
> >> where I need to go to find it.
> >
> >Dave please listen: i have tried both the "by mail" requests and the online
> >requests surfing to the mailman/listinfo/ page corresponding to my current
> >e-mail address:
> >in both cases it fails.
> 
> Now you're even accusing me of not listening. When have I ever not listened to 
> someone?
> 
> It's actually you who weren't listening. Read my statement very carefully. I 
> simply asked you to retype the address which is giving you problems rather than 
> order me to go find some previous message you sent which contains it. That'd 
> mean less typing for you and less work for me. What's wrong with that?
> 
> It seems, though, that you much prefer all of this needless typing to try to 
> tell me how rotten I am. That's truly not helpful to anyone, and probably very 
> boring to the others who have to read it.
> 
> >You're the one and only who can fix it for me, really!
> 
> No, I'm not, as I've decided (see above) to not care about it anymore.
> 
> -- 
> Dave Mielke           | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible is the very Word of God.
> Phone: 1-613-726-0014 | Ottawa, Ontario   | 2011 May 21 is the Day of Judgement.
> EMail: dave at mielke.cc | Canada  K2A 1H7   | 2011 Oct 21 is the End of the World.
> http://FamilyRadio.com/                   | http://Mielke.cc/bible/
> _______________________________________________
> This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list.
> To post a message, send an e-mail to: BRLTTY at mielke.cc
> For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty