[BRLTTY] PLEASE ......................... explain ?

[Labrador]

Hi!

I sincerely regret but had never received any answer. Note that there is no
any filter on my procmail or so: I only use Mutt+Fetchmail+Exim4 on a Debian 
system, and I'm surprised that only this Mailman machine doesn't reacts as 
the others I had submitted my address change.

Seeing this that's why I decided to mail privately to prevent too much
noise on the ML. If there is a similar problem shoudn't that explain why I
don't receive then any machineanswer ? I'm honestly not filtering!
Can't explain. Sorry! 

Thanks for having shown the logs with my trials, so this means the request
itself was received, 
but then I didn't receive any confirmation request! Bizarre :)

Greetings,



On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 01:52:47PM -0500, Dave Mielke wrote:
> Aside from the fact that you really ought to apologize for what amounts to 
> incredible rudeness, I decided to go have a look.
> 
> It turns out that another user (I forget who) already told you a few days ago 
> what the problem must be.
> 
> You yourself observed that every other Mailman server has been working 
> correctly. Why, then, would you simply assume that mine isn't working properly?
> 
> Would it surprise you to learn that my Mailman server is working just as 
> reliably as all the others? I count no less than thirteen attempts made by it 
> to send messages to your new address (see below).
> 
> What the other user suggested to you was that some server, if not your own spam 
> filtering, must be discarding those messages. It sure looks like that must be 
> the case.
> 
> Note that, if this is so, then any attempt by me to personally reply to your 
> new address would likely also get dsicarded. Now what do you think about all 
> your claims that I haven't been responding to your private requests for help?
> 
> Now, from my server's mail log, here are those 13 log entries. Notice that, 
> from my end, every attempt to send your new address a message was successful.
> 
>    Dec  2 07:31:36 ... to=<osvaldo.larosa at .....> ... status=sent (250 OK , completed)
>    Dec  2 11:07:14 ... to=<osvaldo.larosa at .....> ... status=sent (250 OK , completed)
>    Dec  5 04:42:54 ... to=<osvaldo.larosa at .....> ... status=sent (250 OK , completed)
>    Dec  5 05:02:33 ... to=<osvaldo.larosa at .....> ... status=sent (250 OK , completed)
>    Dec  5 06:30:44 ... to=<osvaldo.larosa at .....> ... status=sent (250 OK , completed)
>    Dec  5 06:30:44 ... to=<osvaldo.larosa at .....> ... status=sent (250 OK , completed)
>    Dec  5 14:09:49 ... to=<osvaldo.larosa at .....> ... status=sent (250 OK , completed)
>    Dec  5 14:28:23 ... to=<osvaldo.larosa at .....> ... status=sent (250 OK , completed)
>    Dec  6 14:33:42 ... to=<osvaldo.larosa at .....> ... status=sent (250 OK , completed)
>    Dec  6 15:11:29 ... to=<osvaldo.larosa at .....> ... status=sent (250 OK , completed)
>    Dec 12 09:54:21 ... to=<osvaldo.larosa at .....> ... status=sent (250 OK , completed)
>    Dec 12 12:28:39 ... to=<osvaldo.larosa at .....> ... status=sent (250 OK , completed)
>    Dec 12 12:31:30 ... to=<osvaldo.larosa at .....> ... status=sent (250 OK , completed)